In James v. Bob Ross Buick, where James had been fired from a car dealership that then sent letters to customers under his name, James sued for invasion of privacy and the appeals court held that he had a case because:
a. the Ohio Supreme Court has distinguished between the incidental use of a person's name and likeness from appropriation of the benefits associated with a person's identity
b. the Ohio Supreme Court does not distinguish between the incidental use of a person's name and likeness and the appropriation of the benefits associated with a person's identity
c. there is no difference between a person's signature and a person's picture
d. James has agreed to allow the company to use his picture, but not his name e. none of the other choices
a
You might also like to view...
Agent Michael sold a house that was listed by an outside broker from another company. At closing, Michael was entitled to 1/2 of the commission. What kind of listing did the outside broker probably have?
a. exclusive right to sell b. exclusive agency listing c. open listing d. net listing
In a short essay, list and discuss the three types of scanner data
What will be an ideal response?