Is it possible to effectively regulate the role of money in elections? What are the constitutional implications of such regulation?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Explain why regulating money given to campaigns has constitutional implications, particularly First Amendment rights.
2, Discuss one or more current laws and/or court cases that are directly related to regulating campaign finance, such as the Federal Election Campaign Act (1971), the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002), and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010).
You might also like to view...
Voter turnout used to be calculated as a percentage of the __________, but now political scientists use the __________.
A. voting-age population; vote eligible population B. voting-age population; total population C. vote eligible population; voting-age population D. total population; voting-age population E. total population; vote eligible population
Which of the Framers convened an abolitionist society meeting in his home and invited delegates to the Constitutional Convention to attend?
A. John Adams B. George Washington C. Benjamin Franklin D. James Madison