Compare and contrast judicial self-restraint and judicial activism by analyzing how a proponent of each would have decided Brown v. Board of Education
What will be an ideal response?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Explain that a proponent of judicial self-restraint favors narrow interpretation of the Constitution and would only strike down a law that is clearly unconstitutional.
2. Acknowledge that the segregation policies at issue in Brown were not plainly unconstitutional.
3. Explain that a proponent of judicial activism favors broad constitutional interpretation to promote justice and fairness.
4. Acknowledge that fairness dictated the result in Brown.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a reason why the judiciary in Iran is not an independent branch of the government?
A. It is more republican than the executive branch. B. It is housed within the office of the supreme leader. C. It does not hear cases which deal with members of the ulama. D. It is separate from the office of the country's highest authority on Islamic jurisprudence. E. The head of the judiciary does not have the authority to select judges.
The idea of the city took hold around 7,000 B.C.E
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.