Why would the flu not be a good malady for studying in a N of 1 Randomized Clinical Trial methodology? Why would a group design be better?
What will be an ideal response?
The flu doesn't meet an important criterion associated with successful use of the N of 1 RCT. The flue is neither stable nor chronic; it can't be evaluated over time because it doesn't last long enough. A group design would be better because a researcher can evaluate different treatments over the relatively short course of the flu, without worrying that the symptoms would disappear before different treatments could be evaluated.
You might also like to view...
Foreign governments and private foreign interests play a role in Washington, DC, by
A) contributing large sums of money to the election campaigns of key members of Congress. B) hiring former members of Congress as lobbyists. C) bestowing expensive gifts on members of Congress who travel overseas. D) introducing legislation in Congress that benefits their countries. E) working to increase the complexity of banking regulations between the United States and their countries.
Before the ratification of the Constitution, the United States was organized as a(n) __________
a. confederation b. monarchy c. oligarchy d. conglomerate