The norms of noninterference in the internal affairs of states are stronger than the norms against genocide. Do you agree or disagree? Why? Provide examples to support your answer
What will be an ideal response?
Ideal Answer: The ideal answer should include:
1. Define noninterference and genocide.
2. Recall the implications of self-determination, sovereignty, intervention, social norms, dehumanization, and other key concepts around the two issues.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree with the notion that norms of noninterference in internal affairs of states are stronger than the norms against genocide.
4. Discuss how relevant examples, such as Rwanda, demonstrate the prescience of your answer.
5. Offer a compelling summary and conclusion.
You might also like to view...
Posen argues that state power is measured by __________
a. powerful states themselves b. military capabilities c. economic capacity d. the ability to coerce
Which of these is an example that supports the functionalist view?
a. The League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations. b. The international community strongly supports sanctions against North Korea. c. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade evolved into the World Trade Organization. d. The Cold War competition between the United States and the Soviet Union produced a long period of international stability.