Non-neutral technological change is more valuable to labor than neutral technological change
What will be an ideal response?
True. Neutral technological change leaves the proportion in which inputs are used (for example, the labor/capital ratio) unchanged, but non-neutral technological changes are innovations that alter the labor/capital ratio. The labor/capital ratio used to produce a given level of output falls after non-neutral technological change. Therefore, non-neutral technological change is more valuable to labor than neutral technological change.
You might also like to view...
If 10,000 people are willing to spend a maximum of $20 each to preserve one acre of rainforest, how many acres of rainforest could be preserved, assuming it costs $40 per acre to preserve the rainforest?
a. Zero acres b. 1,000 acres c. 5,000 acres d. 10,000 acres e. There is not enough information to answer the question Feedback
Which of the following describes the role of the government in a fixed exchange rate regime?
a. establishing capital controls b. controlling budget deficits c. buying and selling of currency by the central bank d. expanding the money supply