The systematic exclusion of certain peoples has a history of varied practices and implementations. What is the primary difference between the implementation of numerical quotas and the use of literacy tests in terms of their fundamental designs?
A. Numerical quotas are simpler to systematically implement, while literacy tests require an unrealistic amount of examination and determination.
B. Numerical quotas suggest the absolute limits of the United States’ capacity, while literacy tests suggest the openness of borders to capable peoples.
C. Numerical quotas are quantifiable limitations on certain peoples, while literacy tests are externally neutral with racist intentions.
D. Numerical quotas offer immigrants transparency in terms of immigration limits, while literacy tests generate unfair expectations of openness.
C. Numerical quotas are quantifiable limitations on certain peoples, while literacy tests are externally neutral with racist intentions.
You might also like to view...
Adam Smith contributed to the development of the classical liberal view by arguing that _____
a. the social contract does not apply to relations between states b. wealth had to be evenly distributed for the economy to function optimally c. self-interested individuals operating in a free market context benefit society with their greed d. democratic governments have a responsibility to promote democracy in non-democratic nations
The U.S. House passes a bill dealing with healthcare reform. The Senate passes a bill that is similar but not identical to the House bill. What becomes of the legislation?
a. Both bills go to the president, who chooses which one to sign. b. The legislation dies. c. A conference committee would likely be formed to attempt to reach a compromise between the two bills. d. The Rules Committee would rewrite the two bills to produce a single version. e. The Senate version goes to the president, the House version dies.