Ian views playing Wartcraft and drinking soda as perfect complements (one soda with one hour of playing Wartcraft). Currently, sodas are $1 each and Wartcraft costs $1 per hour. Ian has $12 of income
a. Compute Ian's Compensating Variation if the price of Wartcraft rises to $2.
b. Compute Ian's Equivalent Variation if the price of Wartcraft rises to $2.
c. Compute Ian's change in Consumer Surplus if the price of Wartcraft rises to $2.
a. Ian initially will purchase six units of each. When the price of Wartcraft rises to $2, the only bundle which will return Ian to the same indifference curve is (6,6 ). This bundle now costs $18. Thus the CV = $12 - $18 = -$6. We need to pay Ian $6 to return him to the initial utility level following the price change.
b. After the price change, with an income of $12, Ian will purchase 4 units of each good. If the prices were still $1 each, then the income level that puts Ian at the bundle (4,4 ) is $8. So the
EV = $8 - $12 = -$4.
c. Denote W and S as the quantities of each good. Perfect complements implies that W=S in the optimum. The budget constraint implies that pW + S = 12, where p is the price of Wartcraft and the price of soda is 1. Solve for W = 12/(1 + p). The CS is the integral of 12/(1 + p) between p = 1 and p = 2. This solves to be $4.87 (approx.).
You might also like to view...
Suppose the first hour of study today will allow you to answer 10 correct questions on tomorrow's exam. After the first hour, the marginal benefit of each additional hour of study is reduced by 2 (meaning if you study for 2 hours today your total number of correct response tomorrow will be 18 and if you study 3 hours it will be 24 and so on). If the cost of studying each additional hour is zero, how many hours should you study?
a. 18 b. 10 c. 6 d. 0 e. none of the above
The possibility that the managers of a corporation might not always act in the best interest of its owners is an example of the principal-agent problem
Indicate whether the statement is true or false