To go from "animal" to "dog" to "poodle" is to go up in terms of abstraction

After making an impassioned argument for the legalization of physician-assisted suicide, Morticia is informed by advocates taking a contrary position that much of her most compelling testimony is misleading. Morticia agrees and apologizes, noting that she was relying solely on information she obtained from the Final Exit Network (a group that supports assisted suicide even when the individual is not terminally ill). Has Morticia acted as a responsible advocate?

What will be an ideal response?

Explain the limitations of the four family theories that were covered in the text. As a researcher, what might you do to correct those limitations?

What will be an ideal response?