The "deep structure" auteur criticism tries to uncover is the thematic and stylistic "signature" of a particular artist that is apparent throughout his/her work, regardless of genre

If you were to try to convince an audience that "the movie 'Mississippi Burning' ought to be awarded the Academy Award for best picture," you would be presenting a claim of

a. fact. b. value. c. policy.

Justine Sacco has been the poster child for what not to do on social media, but has paid the price with public shaming around the world. What are two other takeaways from this case?

What will be an ideal response?