Free trade may be good for a nation, but not for everyone in the nation. Explain why free trade is controversial and the list the justifications that proponents of trade adjustment assistance offer in support of those policies
What will be an ideal response?
The nation as a whole is better off as long as the gains from the winners exceed the losses from the losers. Restructuring means that some industries are dying and workers and producers have to find other opportunities. This may be difficult for not only those directly involved in the industry, but also for the surrounding communities. Adjustment assistance states that since the nation as a whole benefits from trade, there are newly added resources that can be used for compensation. Second, there is a potential ethical obligation to assist those hurt by economic change. Third, compensation reduces the incentives for those hurt by trade to fight against free trade policies.
You might also like to view...
Economic growth occurs as a result of all of the following EXCEPT
A) more labor hours. B) growth of capital. C) technological progress. D) less saving.
Goods produced abroad and sold domestically are called exports and goods produced domestically and sold abroad are called imports
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false