John Locke (1632–1704) considered children to be "blank slates" with no specific characteristics or traits. In his view, children were entirely shaped by experience
With this view in mind, construct an argument for Locke's stance in the nature-versus- nurture debate.
What will be an ideal response?
A good answer would include the following key points:
• Locke's view of childhood.
• A definition of the nature-versus-nurture issue. Nature refers to traits, abilities, and capacities that are inherited. Nurture refers to environmental influences that shape behavior.
• Locke believed that children were shaped by their experience; thus, he would subscribe to the notion that nurture ultimately impacts growth and development.
You might also like to view...
Omar is currently undergoing psychoanalysis. His therapist asks him to keep a journal by his bed and write down his dreams immediately upon awakening. Omar brings his journal to therapy and discusses his dreams with his therapist
Omar's therapist is attempting to do which of the following? a) uncover repressed material b) facilitate positive transference c) create resistance within the client d) facilitate unconditional positive regard
The average age for the onset of social anxiety disorder is about age _________
a. 7 b. 10 c. 15 d. 30