Explain why repeated measures designs can be more useful than nonrepeated measures designs when participants provide subjective ratings. Why are objective measures less problematic in nonrepeated designs?
What will be an ideal response?
When participants engage in subjective ratings, as on a Likert-type scale, each person brings his or her own perspective to the judgment task. There is no guarantee that two different people will have the same subjective rating perspective. With objective measures, we rely less on personal perspectives and instead focus on more externally verifiable behaviors.
You might also like to view...
If Court justices have become more willing to monitor the activities of other governmental entities, they likely believe in exercising which of the following?
a. judicial restraint b. judicial conservatism c. judicial originalism d. judicial review
The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks forced military planners to reshape U.S. strategy around the concept of ______________, or wars fought between adversaries of highly uneven material strength.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).