In CASE 18.3 Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District (2013), plaintiff Koontz purchased 14.9 acres of undeveloped land classified as "wetlands." The State of Florida found Koontz's land-use permit proposal (which included land and cash) to develop the land inadequate and imposed more "conditions" to the permit. Koontz found these conditions were excessive under the Nolan and Dollan
cases, and filed suit. The U.S. Supreme Court __________ the Florida Supreme Court, holding that the government's demand for property (and cash) for land under the __________ requirements amounted to a(n) __________ of Koontz's land.
a. affirmed, Kelo, unconstitutional taking
b. reversed, Nolan and Dollan, unconstitutional taking
c. reversed, Kelo, nonconforming use
d. affirmed, Nolan and Dollan, unconstitutional taking
b
You might also like to view...
The time that customers wait to be served at the delicatessen for a grocery store follows the uniform distribution between 0 and 7 minutes. What is the probability that a randomly selected customer will wait more than 4 minutes at the deli?
A) 0.1429 B) 0.2857 C) 0.4286 D) 0.5714
In Town Center Shopping Center v. Premier Mortgage, a lease for office space, made by a manager of a mortgage company, was negated by the courts because the leasing company should have known that a person in the position of the manager would not have such authority
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false