The period from the late 1990s to the winter of 2000 was marked by falling unemployment rates and falling inflation rates as well. How does economic theory explain this apparent violation of the Phillips curve model?

Just as the stagflation of the 1970s and early 1980s could be explained by adverse shifts of the aggregate supply curve, the positive developments of the 1990s can be explained by fortuitous shifts in the aggregate supply curve. The U.S. economy in the 1990s benefited from a whole series of lucky breaks. Among them were a decline in energy prices, the increased value of the dollar and consequent decrease in the price of foreign goods and services, the benefits of significant advances in technology that lower the price of computer power significantly. All of these factors acted in such a way as to shift the aggregate supply curve outward, causing downward pressure on prices, at the same time increasing the level of real GDP and employment. As it has been presented in the Baumol and Blinder text, favorable supply shocks should produce rapid economic growth with falling inflation.

Economics

You might also like to view...

Ebay's use of "bidding agents" will

a. effectively turn an English auction into a Vickery auction b. effectively turn a Vickery auction into an English auction c. decide how much to shade your bid for you d. make you a more aggressive bidder

Economics

If the government passes a law requiring buyers of college textbooks to send $5 to the government for every textbook they buy, then

a. the demand curve for textbooks shifts downward by $5. b. buyers of textbooks pay $5 more per textbook than they were paying before the tax. c. sellers of textbooks are unaffected by the tax. d. All of the above are correct.

Economics