Arnie Stoltz, a 16-year-old living in British Columbia, had had enough of high school. He approached Suzanne Vegan, a 55 year old master chef, to teach him how to be a chef

Suzanne charges $10,000 a year for the two year training program and agreed to allow Arnie to pay her the full amount one year after he completed the program. When Suzanne called on Arnie a year after he completed the training to collect the money, Arnie said he wouldn't pay a cent because he had been a minor when he signed the contract. Which of the following statements best describes Suzanne's legal position in this matter?

A) Arnie must pay because he is no longer a minor.
B) Arnie must pay because a minor must honour a contract for necessities (necessaries).
C) An apprenticeship contract is considered a necessity (necessary) and can be enforced against Arnie.
D) If Suzanne proves the apprenticeship contract was beneficial to Arnie he will have to pay a reasonable price for it.
E) Suzanne must only prove the apprenticeship contract was to Arnie's benefit to get her money

D