What are some examples of acceptable versus taboo trade -offs in negotiation? How does the taboo trade -off
principle operate within systems of sacred and secular values?
What will be an ideal response?
Proposals to exchange sacred values (e.g., human life, familial obligations, national honor) for secular ones (e.g.,
money, time, or convenience) constitute taboo trade-offs. However, some factors allow trade-offs to occur on
sacred issues. It becomes obvious, however, that labeling an issue as sacred may be a negotiation ploy, and by
removing "sacred issues" from bargaining consideration, a negotiator increases the likelihood of a favorable
settlement.
You might also like to view...
The right to share in the profits of the partnership is the right to share in the earnings from the investment of capital
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
List and describe three levels or categories of analytics that are most often viewed as sequential and independent, but also occasionally seen as overlapping
What will be an ideal response?