Because it is difficult to negotiate multilateral trade agreements, some economists argue that preferential trade agreements are always beneficial since they represent a movement toward freer trade, which is better than no movement at all. Is this argument always correct?

a. Yes; any movement toward freer trade is better than no movement at all.
b. No; some preferential trade agreements may have higher trade diversion costs than trade creation gains.
c. Yes; all preferential trade agreements have higher trade creation gains than trade diversion losses.
d. No; all preferential trade agreements have higher trade diversion losses than trade creation gains.

Ans: b. No; some preferential trade agreements may have higher trade diversion costs than trade creation gains.

Economics

You might also like to view...

If real GDP increased by 2% and nominal GDP increased by 2%, then output: a. increased and the price level increased

b. increased and the price level decreased. c. increased and the price level remained unchanged. d. remained unchanged and the price level increased.

Economics

If real GDP decreased by 1% and nominal GDP increased by 2%, then output:

a. increased and the price level increased. b. increased and the price level decreased. c. decreased and the price level increased. d. decreased and the price level decreased.

Economics