According to David Mark, negative campaigning is
a. hard to define and is usually in the eye of the beholder.
b. strictly regulated by the Federal Election Commission.
c. regulated in some states but not at the federal level.
d. destroying democracy in the United States.
a. hard to define and is usually in the eye of the beholder.
You might also like to view...
Why does the incumbent president’s party usually go last in a national convention?
a. That is when there is the most media attention. b. Incumbents are not as important and don’t need to go first. c. There is usually a bounce in poll results so the incumbent goes into the campaign with favorable views. d. So the new candidates do not see the tactics used by the incumbent.
Which of the following best describes what is allowed as a result of the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC?
A. Corporations, unions, and individuals can donate unlimited funds to presidential campaigns. B. Corporations, unions, and individuals can donate unlimited funds to entities that are “independent” of the candidates. C. Corporations, unions, and individuals can donate unlimited funds to political parties. D. Political parties can create special funds from federal monies to donate to candidates. E. Corporations, unions, and individuals can donate unlimited funds to presidential campaigns, as well as to entities that are “independent” of the candidates.