Explain why in the long run a firm that is cost minimizing will choose K and L where:

w/MPL = r/MPK
What does this tell you about the marginal cost of increasing output through hiring labor and the marginal cost of increasing output through adding capital?

This is just a simple rearrangement of the cost-minimization condition MRTS = w/r. Because MRTS = MPL/MPK, then rearranging gives the condition above. For a firm in the long run minimizing costs, if the firm wishes to increase output it can do so by adding labor or capital (or both). The condition above says the cost of an additional unit of output (Q) from increasing labor must equal the cost of increasing output from increasing capital. Intuitively, if this were not the case, the firm could reduce output by lowering the input corresponding to the higher marginal cost and replace that output by increasing the input correspond to the lower marginal cost. Doing so would reduce the overall cost without sacrificing output.

Economics

You might also like to view...

What is the "chicken tax" and why did it come into existence?

What will be an ideal response?

Economics

Fiat money differs from commodity money in that

a) only fiat money can be made legal tender b) fiat money has no intrinsic value c) fiat money is backed by gold d) only fiat money can serve as a unit of account e) only commodity money can serve as a store of value

Economics