Has cross listing been beneficial for most listed companies? If yes, why doesn't every company cross-list?
What will be an ideal response?
It appears that cross-listing has mostly brought benefits for the firms that cross-list. However, firms for which cross-listing is not beneficial should, of course, not do so. The costs associated with cross-listing have to do with the direct costs of registration, the potentially higher costs of more demanding accounting and reporting requirements, and the increased scrutiny and corporate governance that may erode the private benefits of controlling managers. Clearly, not every firm will have an incentive to cross-list.
You might also like to view...
Experiments involving matched groups of subjects—giving them different treatments, controlling unrelated factors, and checking for different responses—is a type of __________.
A. causal information B. descriptive information C. secondary data D. ethnographic research
The service delivery system is composed of
a. Inanimate environment b. Contact personnel c. Other customers d. Front stage e. All of the above