Critical listeners must ask what other choices exist when they encounter an either/or reasoning fallacy

The Martin Corporation was a small family-owned corporation whose owners were also the directors and officers. The corporation's bankers insisted that if any further credit were to be extended to the corporation the owners must guaranty payment by the corporation. This guaranty was agreed to by the owners in writing, and an additional $50,000 loan was granted to Martin Corporation. Which of the following best describes the legal significance of these events?

A. The guaranty by the owners need not have been in writing since it was primarily for their own benefit. B. Once the owners agreed to the undertaking they automatically assumed responsibility for all of the corporation's prior debts. C. In the absence of specific provisions to the contrary, the owners are immediately liable on the debt in the event of the corporation's default. D. Since the owners each participated equally in the guaranty, each can be held liable by the bank, but only to the extent of his proportionate share in relation to the others.

In cooperative ownership the title to real property is:

A. Held in severalty by a corporation. B. Held in severalty by the individual shareholders. C. Held as a joint tenancy by the corporation. D. Held as a joint tenancy by the individual shareholders.