In value argumentation, the use of multiple value criteria by the advocate automatically means that while each is a necessary condition for judging the value object in a particular way,
none of them is sufficient by itself to warrant such a judgment.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
F
You might also like to view...
What three conclusions can be drawn about audience assessments of a speaker's ethos?
What will be an ideal response?
According to the text, the experimental research that manipulated face-ism ratios for
photos of the same individual found that naïve judges rated the people who were high on facial prominence as:
a. less intelligent, less ambitious, and less attractive than people who were low on facial prominence. b. more intelligent, more ambitious, and more attractive than people who were low on facial prominence. c. taller, thinner, and more perfectly proportioned than people who were low on facial prominence. d. shorter, fatter, and more awkwardly proportioned than people who were low on facial prominence. e. equivalent to people who were low on facial prominence on all dimensions measured.