Suppose a city passed a law banning demonstrations that target a specific private residence while allowing them on public sidewalks in general. Based on the Frisby v. Schultz case, such a law would be:

a) okay—not an unconstitutional restriction on freedom of expression; b) a violation of the First Amendment; c) a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment “due process” clause; d) both choices b and c; e) Frisby v. Schultz had nothing to do with demonstrations in residential areas.

B