"The exercise of power always carries risks of unintended consequences." What does this statement from the text actually mean? Do you agree or disagree with this argument? Be sure to include relevant examples in your discussion. Then, discuss what factors you think could explain the unintended consequences of the exercise of power in international relations.

What will be an ideal response?

The ideal answer should include:
1. Discuss what the argument is referring to. For example, the logic of power suggests that in a war, the more powerful state will generally prevail. Thus, estimates of the relative power of the two antagonists should help explain outcomes.
2. Explain whether you agree with the argument and cite examples. For instance, students might cite the Libyan revolutionaries' fight against dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.
3. Discuss what could explain the unintended consequences of the exercise of power. For example, a big GDP may help a country win a war, but it does not eliminate the elements of complexity and luck as situations evolve over the longer term.
4. Offer a concise summary and effective conclusion.