How are ad hoc plans, standing plans, and contingency plans different from one another? How are they similar?
What will be an ideal response?
Ad hoc plans are temporary plans designed to address specific situations. Standing plans are ongoing
and long-term plans designed to nurture important relationships. A danger of standing plans is that
they often stand too long and become a "tradition" divorced from their original values-driven goals.
Contingency plans are "what if" plans, designed to address a variety of situations that may arise.
Crisis communications plans are the best-known form of contingency plans. A common
characteristic of all plans is that they should be values-driven and should strive to fulfill the
organization's mission.
You might also like to view...
_______________ is the process through which you select, organize, and interpret sensory stimuli in the world around you
a. Perception b. Promotion c. Self-monitoring d. Supplication e. Personal reflection
According to Miike, conflict arises _______
a. from cultural differences b. from ignorance of cultural differences c. from dogmatic adherence to cultural norms d. A and C are true