Paul holds an information session, which his flyers advertised as an opportunity for students to learn more about campus rules about alcohol
At the event, Paul explains the different rules present on his own campus and on many other campuses of similar size, emphasizing how each affects students' academic performance and campus judicial board incidences. The next day, Paul announces his intent to run for student body president. Explain the ethical implications of Paul's choices and explain what Paul could have done differently.
What will be an ideal response?
The best answers will:
1. identify that Paul acted unethically by cloaking persuasion under the guise of informative speaking.
2. explain that Paul's ethical lapse was a lack of transparency in his speaking situation – Paul should have made his intent to run clear before the speech so listeners would realize that Paul likely wished to convince his audience to support his candidacy, rather than merely inform them of a campus issue.
3. offer improvements Paul could enact, such as announcing his candidacy before speaking and clarifying that he has a stake in or bias towards a specific stance on this issue.
You might also like to view...
These days, most public relations students will be successful in finding more paid internships
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
When your general purpose is to ________, you act as a partisan or an advocate.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).