Suppose the marginal product of labor in the economy is given by MPN = 200 - 0.5 N, while the supply of labor is 100 + 4w
(a) Find the market-clearing real wage rate.
(b) What happens if the government imposes a minimum wage of 40? Is there involuntary unemployment?
(c) What happens if the government imposes a minimum wage of 60? Is there involuntary unemployment?
(a) The market-clearing real wage rate equates the demand and supply of labor. Setting w = MPN = 200 - 0.5 N and solving for N gives N = 400 - 2w, which represents labor demand. Equating labor demand to labor supply gives 400 - 2w = 100 + 4w, or 300 = 6w, or w = 50.
(b) A minimum wage of 40 has no effect, as it is below the market wage, so involuntary unemployment is 0.
(c) A minimum wage of 60 is binding, as it is above the market wage. At w = 60, labor demand is 400 - (2 × 60 ) = 280, while labor supply is 100 + (4 × 60 ) = 340. So unemployment is 60 workers.
You might also like to view...
Your college has three meal plans. One is for 21 meals a week, another for 14 and a third offers only 7. You don't know the price yet but you are certain the 21 would be best. However, your second choice would be to take only the 7 meal plan and if you had to pick a third choice it would be the 14 meal plan. This preference pattern doesn't fit the indifference curve assumption of
A. convexity. B. completeness. C. transitivity. D. none of these because it does not violate any of the assumptions.
Economic theory would be much less successful than it is in predicting the consequences of particular actions if
What will be an ideal response?