A witness for the prosecution is introducing a tape recording that clearly implicates the person on trial in a crime. While the information is factual and accurate, and there is no doubt about where the recording came from, it is hightly prejudicial to the suspect. On what grounds can the counsel for the defense get this evidence removed?

a. The evidence is not authentic since it is prejudicial in nature.
b. The tape recording is declared inadmissible since it is hearsay.
c. Due to its prejudicial nature, the evidence is determined by the judge to be incompetent.
d. The tape recording falls under the classification of privileged information and is thereby not admissible.

c.