Funding for Texas roads has changed substantially in the past couple of decades. What have the changes been, and how have Texas legislators’ views on taxes been a primary cause?
What will be an ideal response?
Texas legislators see great political benefit to opposing tax hikes in a state of similarly minded voters. Although this is politically successful, it may be at odds with the demands that having a rapidly growing population places on the roadway needs for the state. Abandoning the pay-as-you-go requirements in transportation funding has allowed the state to issue bonds to build and maintain roads, borrowing money that is to be paid back by residents. Also, public-private partnerships have given a market incentive to private companies to build and maintain roads with private money to be recouped with tolls and fees. The net result is a shift away from taxes paying for road costs to a system of loans and fees.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following are used by the Democratic Party but not the Republican Party?
a. Open primaries b. Closed primaries c. Superdelegates d. Winner-take-all primaries e. Caucuses
Caucuses differ from primaries in which of the following ways?
A) The rules are more complicated. B) They take longer to complete. C) They require participants to make their preference known publicly. D) They have smaller turnout. E) All of the above