"The costs and benefits for a country from joining a fixed-exchange rate area such as the EMS depend on how well-integrated its economy is with those of its potential partners." Discuss

What will be an ideal response?

We will expand on this idea, which is roughly the theory of an optimum currency area as developed by Mundell. A major economic benefit of fixed exchange rates is that they simplify economic calculations and provide a more predictable basis for decisions that involve international transactions than do floating rates. This gain in monetary efficiency would be even higher if the factors of production could migrate freely. The costs of joining a fixed-exchange rate area is that a country gives up the ability to use the exchange rate and monetary policy to stabilize the domestic economy. So, if a country has a well-integrated economy with those in the fixed-exchange rate area, then the benefits would likely outweigh the costs.

Economics

You might also like to view...

Refer to Figure 22-2. Assuming no technological change, if the United States increases capital per hour worked by $40,000 every year between 2012 and 2016, we would expect to see

A) real GDP per hour worked will be lower in 2016 than it was in 2012. B) the per-worker production function will get flatter over time. C) real GDP per hour worked will increase by the same increment each year between 2012 and 2016. D) the per-worker production function will shift up every year there is increase in capital per hour worked.

Economics

Mutual funds are primarily held by

A) financial institutions. B) households. C) nonfinancial businesses. D) the Social Security trust fund.

Economics