Describe the impact on a candidate of a long nomination and general election campaign. What physical and mental stresses result from such a campaign? How might these impacts ultimately affect the election?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Describe the long, exhausting days on the campaign. A typical day might involve a series of staged events, meetings, luncheons, fundraisers, parties, dinners, speeches, and so on.
2. Describe regular meetings with campaign staff, strategy sessions, decisions on where to spend money, and substantial travel.
3. Describe constant interaction with the press.
4. Describe how the lengthy campaign and long days can result in significant stress for the candidate and the candidate's family. They have very little rest, and this fatigue can affect their performance in the campaign as they are more likely to make gaffes. These gaffes can ultimately sink a campaign.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a key criticism of political
science to convey that it fails to meet the requirement as a "real" science? A) It employs the scientific method in a different manner. B) It lacks the scientific elements present in the hard sciences like physics or chemistry. C) Every country is vastly different. D) It lacks statistical methods for analyzing data.
How do slander and libel differ?
a. Slander includes erroneous statements, whereas libel is factual. b. Slander is defamation made in speech, whereas libel is made in writing. c. Slander is protected by the First Amendment, whereas libel is not. d. Slander is truthful accusations, whereas libel includes false accusations. e. Slander is written defamation, whereas libel is spoken defamation.