Suppose the Fed buys government securities from a commercial bank. Why is there a multiplier effect on the quantity of money?
What will be an ideal response?
When the Fed buys government securities from a bank, the payment to the bank is in the form of reserves. Hence the bank gains excess reserves. The bank can loan these excess reserves. When the loan is spent, the recipients deposit some or all of the funds in their banks. These banks gain deposits (which increase the quantity of money) as well as excess reserves. The "second round" banks then loan their excess reserves. And when these loans are spent, once again the recipients deposit some or all of the funds in their banks. These third-round banks thereby gain deposits (which further increases the quantity of money) as well as excess reserves. These reserves are loaned, spent, and then deposited in a fourth round of banks, which still further increases the quantity of money. Hence the process of loaning and depositing the proceeds increases the quantity of money by a multiple of the initial amount of the open market operation.
You might also like to view...
When a certain monopoly sets its price at $8 it sells 64 units. When the monopoly sets its price at $10 it sells 62 units. The marginal revenue for the firm over this range is
a. $22. b. $27. c. $54. d. $108.
Suppose you drive a car that gets good gas mileage, and you notice that more and more people are driving gas-guzzling cars. Their increased demand for gas:
A. is likely to cause the price you pay for gas to increase. B. does not change the price you pay, but it reduces the quantity of gas supplied. C. is likely to cause the price you pay for gas to decrease. D. does not affect you.