Mr. Landis owned two pieces of property and sold one parcel bordering on the road to Ms. Cowan's house, reserving in the deed an easement for ingress (entry) and egress (exit) to and from the remaining real property for himself. After 5 years of non-use, Landis attempted to use the easement, but was prohibited from doing so by Cowan. A court would rule in this case that:
a. the easement was forfeited because it was not used for 5 years
b. the easement was still valid because non use never terminates any type of easement
c. Ms Cowan could institute a quiet title action on the easement and probably be successful
d. the easement was still valid since it had been created by the deed.
Answer: d. the easement was still valid since it had been created by the deed.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statement is true about the price component of a marketing mix?
a. It is the quickest element to change. b. It is the least important of the four Ps. c. It is the starting point of the marketing mix. d. It is decided independently of the external environment of the business.
The impact of country of origin is independent of the type of product
Indicate whether the statement is true or false