In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the Supreme Court upheld the censorship of a high school newspaper. What was the basis for the Court's ruling? Have cases concerning college publications followed the same approach?
What will be an ideal response?
[The newspaper was deemed a laboratory paper, not a public forum, and therefore censorship by school authorities was permissible for any "reasonable" purpose. Weighing against forum status were the facts that the paper was solely the product of a high school journalism class, and the teacher assigned and edited stories. In the college-press cases of Kincaid and Hosty, two different federal courts took different approaches. In one, the court deemed a yearbook a limited public forum, without a full Hazelwood analysis. In the other, the court said a Hazelwood-like forum analysis was applicable.]
You might also like to view...
Anna started renting a new office near a busy railway station. It was spacious enough to accommodate all her employees comfortably, however, the creativity of the team declined. They said that the constant noise was the main cause
Which barrier to group creativity is her team facing? a) Poor physical surroundin b) Premature evaluation of ideas c) Poor timing d) Stinking thinking
Conquergood’s first pitfall of listening, ___________________ , is characterized by our attempts to hear others only as a means of benefitting ourselves.
A. Custodian’s Rip –Off B. Curator’s Exhibitionism C. Enthusiast’s Infatuation D. Skeptic’s Cop-Out