Why would synesthesia be best studied in a single-case approach? Also, why would a group study be inappropriate if a researcher actually had access to a large number of synesthetes?
What will be an ideal response?
A case study would be best for studying synesthesia because some estimates say that only about one person in 100,000 experiences synesthesia. So it would be very difficult to get a group for study.
A group study would be inappropriate even if there were a large number available because they each show such different experiences. There may be little commonality in the way they experience the world, so making statements about them as a group might provide little information.
You might also like to view...
As described by Wade, what was neoliberalism's principal yardstick for measuring business success?
a. liquidity b. net income c. market share d. shareholder value e. territorial expansion
What distinguishes the modern presidency from the institution originally envisioned by the framers of the Constitution?
a. The modern presidency has become the central focus of American politics since the 1930s, supplanting Congress as the "first branch" of government. b. The modern presidency is less involved in the development of foreign policy than the framers intended. c. Modern presidents exhibit a greater level of deference to Congress in budgetary matters than the framers intended. d. Modern presidents are more cautious in advocating for their legislative agendas than the framers intended.