Explain the core knowledge perspective of cognitive development. What do critics say about the perspective?

What will be an ideal response?

Answer: According to the core knowledge perspective, babies are born with a set of innate knowledge systems, or core domains of thought. Each of these prewired understandings permits a ready grasp of new, related information and therefore supports early, rapid development. Core knowledge theorists argue that infants could not make sense of the complex stimulation around them without having been genetically "set up" in the course of evolution to comprehend its crucial aspects. Core knowledge researchers have conducted many studies of infants' physical, linguistic, psychological, and numerical knowledge.
Critics take issue with the core knowledge assumption, based on violation-of-expectation findings, that infants are endowed with knowledge. They argue that young infants' looking behaviors may indicate only a perceptual preference, not the existence of concepts and reasoning. And indisputable evidence for built-in core knowledge requires that it be demonstrated at birth or close to it—in the absence of relevant opportunities to learn. Finally, the core knowledge perspective, while emphasizing native endowment, acknowledges that experience is essential for children to extend this initial knowledge. But so far, it has said little about which experiences are most important in each core domain and how those experiences advance children's thinking.